Good night.
I decided to put some of my conference paper's results in the weblog. therefore you can see them underneath. First of all, I had separated the time history of water level in lake every 107 years. you can see the results in Fig.1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdf75/cdf75f2ad81f0fa02a1325d6de3411170863ef20" alt="" |
Fig.1. Trend Analysis. |
you can see the changes in trends here every 107 years. It is obvius that the great changes was occurred in late 90's. Then I decided to fit the best polynomial curve for it. So here is the results (Fig.2).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10fba/10fba585d6cf195699bf87c6bb9803b2b2c7c5b6" alt="" |
Fig.2. Polynomial Curve Fitting Results. |
Then, I simulated the water level in lake by ANN and MLR techniques (time-lag) and you can see the the results of GRN, MLR and RBF in Fig 3~5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dc05/5dc0543f91287a1f7470fcd9c56f8c575766273d" alt="" |
Fig.3. GRN results |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d781/3d7811538c664672f03b7b2ed19150296664e312" alt="" |
Fig.4. RBF results |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9424b/9424b639a503f8157b78c5305804660fc7ff8d67" alt="" |
Fig.5. MLR results |
As you can see here the best fitted model is MLR, so I think the reaction is totally linear (I didn't put the results of FFBP but I tested it, the best result was still in MLR).
Sincerely yours.
Babak Vaheddoost.
No comments:
Post a Comment